Medical Journals

Molecular Phylogeny of the Stromateoid Fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes) Inferred from Mitochondrial Dna Sequences and Compared with Morphology-based Hypotheses.

Authors:
  • Doiuchi Ryu
  • Nakabo Tetsuji

From: Fisheries Experimental Station, Wakayama Prefectural Research Center of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, Kushimoto 1551, Kushimoto-cho, Higashimuro-gun, Wakayama 649-3503, Japan. doiuchi.r@nifty.com

Molecular phylogenetics and evolution

  • Publish Date: Apr 2006
  • ISSN: 1055-7903
  • Volume: 39
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 111-23
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Doiuchi Ryu, Nakabo Tetsuji, et al. Molecular Phylogeny of the Stromateoid Fishes (Teleostei: Perciformes) Inferred from Mitochondrial Dna Sequences and Compared with Morphology-based Hypotheses.. Mol. Phylogenet. Evol. Apr 2006;39:111-23

Abstract

The phylogenetic relationships among 21 species of stromateoid fishes, representing five families and 13 genera, were reconstructed using 3263bp of mitochondrial DNA sequences, including the posterior half of the 16S rRNA and entire COI and Cytb genes. The resultant molecular phylogenies were compared with previous phylogenetic hypotheses inferred from morphological characters. Molecular phylogenetic trees were constructed using the maximum parsimony, maximum likelihood, and Bayesian methods. All three methods resulted in well-resolved trees with most nodes being supported by moderate to high support values. In contrast to previous morphological analyses, which resulted in non-monophyly of Centrolophidae, all three methods utilized for the present molecular analyses supported the monophyly of Centrolophidae, as well as the reciprocal monophyly of the other stromateoid families, previous morphological hypotheses being rejected by the Templeton and Shimodaira-Hasegawa tests. In addition, the three methods indicated a sister-group relationship between Ariommatidae and Nomeidae. The position of Tetragonuridae was, however, incongruent between the MP method and the ML and Bayesian methods, being placed in the most basal position of Stromateoidei in the former, but occupying a sister relationship to Stromateidae in the latter. Comparison of the molecular phylogenies to previous morphological hypotheses suggested that evolutionary changes in morphological characters have not occurred equally among the stromateoid lineages, the evolution of the centrolophids not having been accompanied by appreciable morphological changes, whereas other stromateoids have undergone considerable morphological changes during their evolutionary history. The molecular phylogenies also shed some light on the evolutionary pattern of the pharyngeal sac, two of the four types of sac corresponding to two main lineages of Stromateoidei. Some taxonomic implications were also discussed.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, DNA, Mitochondrial, Evolution, Evolution, Molecular, Perciformes, Pharynx, Phylogeny, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Variation (Genetics)


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16314116


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.