Medical Journals

Fatty Acid Binding Proteins: Same Structure but Different Binding Mechanisms? Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein.

Authors:
  • Friedman Ran
  • Nachliel Esther
  • Gutman Menachem

From: Laser Laboratory for Fast Reactions in Biology, Department of Biochemistry, George S. Wise Faculty of Life Sciences, Tel Aviv University, 69978 Tel Aviv, Israel.

Biophysical journal

  • Publish Date: Mar 2006
  • ISSN: 0006-3495
  • Volume: 90
  • Issue: 5
  • Pages: 1535-45
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Friedman Ran, Nachliel Esther, Gutman Menachem, et al. Fatty Acid Binding Proteins: Same Structure but Different Binding Mechanisms? Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Intestinal Fatty Acid Binding Protein.. Biophys. J. Mar 2006;90:1535-45

Abstract

Fatty acid binding proteins (FABPs) carry fatty acids (FAs) and other lipids in the cellular environment, and are thus involved in processes such as FA uptake, transport, and oxidation. These proteins bind either one or two ligands in a binding site, which appears to be inaccessible from the bulk. Thus, the entry of the substrate necessitates a conformational change, whose nature is still unknown. A possible description of the ligand binding process is given by the portal hypothesis, which suggests that the FA enters the protein through a dynamic area known as the portal region. On the other hand, recent simulations of the adipocyte lipid binding protein (ALBP) suggested a different entry site (the alternative portal). In this article, we discuss molecular dynamics simulations of the apo-intestinal-FABP (I-FABP) in the presence of palmitate molecule(s) in the simulation box. The simulations were carried out to study whether the FA can enter the protein during the simulations (as in the ALBP) and where the ligand entry site is (the portal region, the alternative portal or a different domain). The analysis of the simulations revealed a clear difference between the ALBP and the I-FABP. In the latter case, the palmitate preferentially adsorbed to the portal region, which was more mobile than the rest of the protein. However, no ligand entry was observed in the multi-nanosecond-long simulations, in contrast to ALBP. These findings suggest that, although the main structural motif of the FABPs is common, the fine details of each individual protein structure grossly modulate its reactivity.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adsorption, Binding Sites, Computer Simulation, Fatty Acid-Binding Proteins, Kinetics, Models, Chemical, Models, Molecular, Palmitic Acid, Protein Binding, Protein Conformation


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16361342


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.