Self-reported Walking, Balance Testing and Risk of Fall Among the Elderly
From: Avdeling for helsefag, Høgskolen i Oslo, 0130 Oslo. astrid.bergland@hf.hio.no
Tidsskrift for den Norske laegeforening
- Publish Date: Jan 2006
- ISSN: 0807-7096
- Volume: 126
- Issue: 2
- Pages: 176-8
- Medium: Internet
- Language:
- Citation (JAMA): Bergland Astrid, Jarnlo Gunn-Britt, Wyller Torgeir Bruun, et al. Self-reported Walking, Balance Testing and Risk of Fall Among the Elderly. Tidsskr. Nor. Laegeforen. Jan 2006;126:176-8
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Falls represent an important health problem among the elderly. Balance testing as well as registration of self-reported balance problems may be appropriate in order to predict the risk of future falls. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Self-reported walking was assessed in 307 randomly selected women 75 years or older living at home. The women underwent testing of gait and balance and were followed up for one year with respect to falls and fall-related injuries. RESULTS: 155 of the women fell during the observation period; 308 falls were reported. 13% of the falls resulted in a fracture. Factor analysis identified five anamnestic questions measuring the same latent construct. The sum score of this self-reported walking index correlated highly with simple balance tests. A poor result on the walking index indicated a high risk of falling (odds ratio (OR) 1.83, 95% confidence interval 1.41-2.30) and of fall-related fractures (OR 2.65, 95 % CI 1.27-5.05) the subsequent year. The areas under the ROC curves (receiver-operating characteristics) were, however, only .57 for falls and .61 for fractures. INTERPRETATION: Simple questions give useful information on the risk of falls and fall-related fractures among elderly women.
Mesh Headings (Keywords): Accidental Falls, Aged, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Fractures, Bone, Gait, Humans, Musculoskeletal Equilibrium, Predictive Value of Tests, Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Sensitivity and Specificity, Walking
Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16415942
This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.
Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.
The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.
