Medical Journals

Validity and Reliability of a New in Vivo Ankle Stiffness Measurement Device.

Authors:
  • Zinder Steven M
  • Granata Kevin P
  • Padua Darin A
  • Gansneder Bruce M

From: Department of Kinesiology, California State University, Fullerton, P.O. Box 6870, Fullerton, CA 92834, USA. szinder@fullerton.edu

Journal of biomechanics

  • Publish Date: 2007
  • ISSN: 0021-9290
  • Volume: 40
  • Issue: 2
  • Pages: 463-7
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Zinder Steven M, Granata Kevin P, Padua Darin A, et al. Validity and Reliability of a New in Vivo Ankle Stiffness Measurement Device.. 2007;40:463-7

Abstract

This investigation was designed to test the validity and reliability of a new measure of inversion/eversion ankle stiffness on a unique medial/lateral swaying cradle device utilizing a test/retest with comparison to a known standard. Ankle stiffness is essential to maintaining joint stability. Most ankle injuries occur via an inversion mechanism. To date, very little information is available regarding stiffness of the evertor muscles in the prevention of excessive inversion joint rotation. Transient oscillation data representing inversion/eversion stiffness was obtained in a bipedal weight-bearing stance with an upright posture. Using commercially available springs with stiffness of 4.80N/cm the measured value recorded by the cradle was 4.87N/cm. Mean active stiffness values of the ankle were 35.70Nm/cm (SD 9.45). The trial-to-trial reliability ICC (2,1) coefficient was 0.96 with an SEM of 2.05Nm/rad, and the day-to-day reliability ICC (2,k) coefficient was 0.93 and an SEM of 3.00Nm/rad. The results demonstrate that inversion/eversion ankle stiffness measures on this device are a valid, repeatable and consistent measure. This is relevant because the ability to accurately quantify inversion/eversion ankle stiffness will improve our understanding of biomechanical stability and factors that influence it. It will also enable identification of ankle injury risk factors that will lead to more efficient rehabilitation programs and injury prevention strategies.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adult, Ankle Joint, Biomechanics, Female, Humans, Male, Range of Motion, Articular, Reproducibility of Results


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16458900


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.