Medical Journals

Towards Understanding of Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load in Habitual Diet: Associations with Measures of Glycaemia in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.

Authors:
  • Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J
  • Dhawan Ashish
  • Liese Angela D
  • Teff Karen
  • Schulz Mandy

From: Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina Arnold School of Public Health, 2718 Middleburg Drive, Columbia, SC 29208, USA.

The British journal of nutrition

  • Publish Date: Feb 2006
  • ISSN: 0007-1145
  • Volume: 95
  • Issue: 2
  • Pages: 397-405
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Mayer-Davis Elizabeth J, Dhawan Ashish, Liese Angela D, et al. Towards Understanding of Glycaemic Index and Glycaemic Load in Habitual Diet: Associations with Measures of Glycaemia in the Insulin Resistance Atherosclerosis Study.. Br. J. Nutr. Feb 2006;95:397-405

Abstract

Epidemiologic studies have applied the glycaemic index (GI) and glycaemic load (GL) to assessments of usual dietary intake. Results have been inconsistent particularly for the association of GI or GL with diabetes incidence. We aimed to advance understanding of the GI and GL as applied to food frequency questionnaires (FFQ) by evaluating GI and GL in relation to plasma measures of glycaemia. Included were 1255 adults at a baseline examination (1994-6) and 813 who returned for the 5-year follow-up examination. Usual diet, at both examinations, was assessed by a validated FFQ. GI and GL were evaluated in relation to average fasting glucose (two measures at each examination) and 2 h post-75 g glucose load plasma glucose (baseline and follow-up), and glycated haemoglobin (A1c; follow-up only); using generalized linear models. Correlation coefficients (r) for GI and GL related to measures of glycaemia, adjusted for total energy intake, ranged from -0.004 to 0.04 (all NS) for both examinations. Adjustment for potential confounders, for fasting glucose in models for 2 h glucose (to model incremental glucose) and for average fasting glucose in models for A1c (to account, in part, for overnight endogenous glucose production) also did not materially alter findings, nor did inclusion of data from both examinations together in linear mixed models. The present results call into question the utility of GI and GL to reflect glycaemic response to food adequately, when used in the context of usual diet. Further work is needed to quantify usual dietary exposures relative to glucose excursion and associated chronic glycaemia and other metabolic parameters.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adult, Aged, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Energy Intake, Fasting, Female, Glucose Intolerance, Glycemic Index, Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Nutrition Assessment, Questionnaires


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16469159


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.