Comparison of the Replication of Influenza A Viruses in Chinese Ring-necked Pheasants and Chukar Partridges.
From: Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Virology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN 38105-2794, USA.
Journal of virology
- Publish Date: Mar 2006
- ISSN: 0022-538X
- Volume: 80
- Issue: 5
- Pages: 2151-61
- Medium: Print
- Language: English
- Citation (JAMA): Humberd Jennifer, Guan Yi, Webster Robert G, et al. Comparison of the Replication of Influenza A Viruses in Chinese Ring-necked Pheasants and Chukar Partridges.. J. Virol. Mar 2006;80:2151-61
Abstract
We investigated the replication and transmission of avian influenza A viruses in two species thought to be intermediate hosts in the spread of influenza A viruses in live poultry markets: Chinese ring-necked pheasants and chukar partridges. All 15 hemagglutinin subtypes replicated in pheasants, and most subtypes transmitted to naïve contact pheasants, primarily via the fecal-oral route. Many viruses were shed from the gastrointestinal tract of experimentally inoculated pheasants for 14 days or longer. Virus was isolated from the cloacal swabs of one contact pheasant for an unprecedented 45 days. Chukar partridges were less susceptible to infection with avian influenza viruses. The viruses that replicated in chukar partridges were isolated for 7 days after experimental inoculation, predominantly from the respiratory tract. We detected high neutralizing antibody titers with correspondingly low levels of serum hemagglutination inhibition antibody titers in pheasants and chukar partridges when chicken red blood cells were used in serological analyses. When horse erythrocytes were used, antibody titers were comparable to those obtained by using the neutralization assay. More importantly, the results suggested that pheasants can serve as a reservoir of influenza virus. Because of their continuous asymptomatic infection and longer stay in the markets, pheasants are ideal “carriers” of influenza A viruses. Their continued presence in live markets contributes to the perpetuation and genetic interaction of influenza viruses there. On the basis of our findings, it does not make good sense to ban quail but not pheasants from the live markets.
Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, Antibodies, Viral, Carrier State, Cloaca, Disease Reservoirs, Feces, Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests, Influenza A virus, Influenza in Birds, Neutralization Tests, Poultry, Virus Replication, Virus Shedding
Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16474123
This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.
Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.
The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.