Differential Parental Nutrient Allocation in Two Congeneric Pipefish Species (Syngnathidae: Syngnathus Spp.).
From: Department of Biology, West Virginia University, PO Box 6057, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA. jripley@mix.wvu.edu
The Journal of experimental biology
- Publish Date: Mar 2006
- ISSN: 0022-0949
- Volume: 209
- Issue: Pt 6
- Pages: 1112-21
- Medium: Print
- Language: English
- Citation (JAMA): Ripley Jennifer L, Foran Christy M, et al. Differential Parental Nutrient Allocation in Two Congeneric Pipefish Species (Syngnathidae: Syngnathus Spp.).. J. Exp. Biol. Mar 2006;209:1112-21
Abstract
Male seahorses and pipefishes of the family Syngnathidae are heralded for their unique brood pouch structures for incubating embryos. There are three general types of brood pouch with increasing complexity: simple ventral gluing, two pouch flaps and a completely sealed sac. The diversity of functional roles within a type in providing nutrition, aeration and protection to offspring is unknown. Here we reveal significant differences in parental nutrient allocation to embryos for two closely related, sympatric pipefishes with similar brood pouch structure. We document differences in embryo attachment, depletion of pouch fluid nutrients over development and egg nutrient partitioning between Syngnathus floridae and Syngnathus fuscus. In S. fuscus, females produce nutritionally poor eggs and the males implant developing embryos in the brood pouch adjacent to blood vessels. A female-biased breeding population was observed, supporting the hypothesis that the cost of male parental care is high in this species. The loose connection between eggs and brood pouch tissues and the appearance of undeveloped eggs and lipid droplets in the pouch of S. floridae males suggest this species utilizes nutrient-rich eggs produced by females as nurse eggs to supplement embryonic development. A balanced sex-ratio for S. floridae further supports more equal parental contribution. This comparison provides evidence of a decline in female gametic investment and reveals the rapid diversification of syngnathid brood pouch function. Our results indicate gross classification of brooding structures into one of the three general pouch types does not predict the energetic investment of males in parental care. But rather, physiological characterization of the relative investment by each sex to offspring is essential to understanding the functional significance of the brood pouch.
Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animal Feed, Animal Nutrition Physiology, Animals, Breeding, Female, Fishes, Male, Poaceae, Reproduction, Seasons, Sex Ratio, Virginia
Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16513938
This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.
Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.
The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.