Medical Journals

Assessment of Biases Associated with Profiling Simple, Model Communities Using Terminal-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-based Analyses.

Authors:
  • Frey Julie C
  • Angert Esther R
  • Pell Alice N

From: Department of Animal Science, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14853, USA.

Journal of microbiological methods

  • Publish Date: Oct 2006
  • ISSN: 0167-7012
  • Volume: 67
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 9-19
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Frey Julie C, Angert Esther R, Pell Alice N, et al. Assessment of Biases Associated with Profiling Simple, Model Communities Using Terminal-restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism-based Analyses.. J. Microbiol. Methods Oct 2006;67:9-19

Abstract

Community profiles based on terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analyses of amplified ribosomal RNA genes are used to monitor changes in microbial community structure and are sometimes employed for semi-quantitative estimates of species richness and abundance in environmental samples. To assess the accuracy of T-RFLP community profiles representing the relative abundance of bacteria in a sample, five species of ruminal bacteria were used to construct simple “communities”. Template DNA for PCR amplification was generated either by mixing equal quantities of genomic DNA from pure cultures or by mixing equal numbers of cells prior to DNA extraction. Pairwise mixtures of Fibrobacter succinogenes S85 with Ruminococcus albus 8, Ruminococcus flavefaciens FD-1, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens 49 and Streptococcus bovis JB1 were created and a 5-member community was constructed. With genomic DNA mixes, relative abundance calculations based on T-RFLP patterns did not reflect input ratios. These discrepancies could not be accounted for by differences in genome size and rRNA operon copy number. In cell mixing experiments, easily lysed cells were overrepresented. To determine if a numerical correction factor could be used to compensate for observed discrepancies, we attempted to quantify biases attributed to DNA extraction and PCR amplification. Biases attributable to these factors led to deviations from expected PCR product ratios by 6% to 38%. We found that interactions were so complex that a suitable factor could not be derived. The unsystematic dependence of T-RFLP peak ratios on variability of DNA extraction and PCR amplification prevents accurate quantification of the relative abundance of microorganisms designed to represent simplified natural populations.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Bacteria, Bias (Epidemiology), Butyrivibrio, DNA Fingerprinting, DNA, Bacterial, Fibrobacter, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length, RNA, Ribosomal, Ruminococcus, Streptococcus bovis


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16563536


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.