Medical Journals

A Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Respiratory Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:
  • Koroglu Ahmet
  • Teksan Huseyin
  • Sagir Ozlem
  • Yucel AytaƧ
  • Toprak Huseyin I
  • Ersoy Ozcan M

From: Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Inonu University, Medical Faculty, 44315 Malatya, Turkey. akoroglu@inonu.edu.tr

Anesthesia and analgesia

  • Publish Date: Jul 2006
  • ISSN: 1526-7598
  • Volume: 103
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 63-7, table of contents
  • Medium: Internet
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Koroglu Ahmet, Teksan Huseyin, Sagir Ozlem, et al. A Comparison of the Sedative, Hemodynamic, and Respiratory Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol in Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging.. Anesth. Analg. Jul 2006;103:63-7, table of contents

Abstract

We compared the sedative, hemodynamic, and respiratory effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol in children undergoing magnetic resonance imaging procedures. Sixty children were randomly distributed into two groups: The dexmedetomidine (D) group received 1 microg/kg initial dose followed by continuous infusion of 0.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1) and a propofol group (P) received 3 mg/kg initial dose followed by a continuous infusion of 100 microg.kg(-1).min(-1). Inadequate sedation was defined as difficulty in completing the procedure because of the child’s movement during magnetic resonance imaging. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate, peripheral oxygen saturation, and respiratory rate (RR) were recorded during the study. The onset of sedation, recovery, and discharge time were significantly shorter in group P than in group D. MAP, heart rate, and RR decreased during sedation from the baseline values in both groups. MAP and RR were significantly lower in group P than in group D during sedation. Desaturation was observed in four children of group P. Dexmedetomidine and propofol provided adequate sedation in most of the children. We conclude that although propofol provided faster anesthetic induction and recovery times, it caused hypotension and desaturation. Thus, dexmedetomidine could be an alternative reliable sedative drug to propofol in selected patients.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Blood Pressure, Child, Child, Preschool, Conscious Sedation, Dexmedetomidine, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Hypnotics and Sedatives, Infant, Infusions, Intravenous, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Oxygen, Propofol, Respiration


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16790627


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.