Medical Journals

Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1990 Through 2002. A Review of the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry.

Authors:
  • Sheng Pu-Yi
  • Konttinen Liisa
  • Lehto Matti
  • Ogino Daisuke
  • Jämsen Esa
  • Nevalainen Juha
  • Pajamäki Jorma
  • Halonen Pekka
  • Konttinen Yrjö T

From: COXA Hospital for Joint Replacement, Tampere, Finland.

The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume

  • Publish Date: Jul 2006
  • ISSN: 0021-9355
  • Volume: 88
  • Issue: 7
  • Pages: 1425-30
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Sheng Pu-Yi, Konttinen Liisa, Lehto Matti, et al. Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty: 1990 Through 2002. A Review of the Finnish Arthroplasty Registry.. Jul 2006;88:1425-30

Abstract

BACKGROUND: National and regional arthroplasty registries have been used to study the results of primary total knee arthroplasties. The purpose of this paper was to present the results of revision total knee replacements and describe predictors of survival of those replacements, with repeat revision as the end point. METHODS: The nationwide Finnish Arthroplasty Registry included 2637 revision total knee arthroplasties from 1990 through 2002. Survivorship of the revision total knee arthroplasties was analyzed, with repeat revision as the end point. The survivorship analyses comprised evaluations of the proportional hazards assumption followed by calculations of univariate and multivariate statistics and model diagnostics as appropriate. RESULTS: The survival rate following the revision total knee arthroplasties was 95% (95% confidence interval, 94% to 96%) at two years (1874 knees), 89% (95% confidence interval, 88% to 90%) at five years (944 knees), and 79% (95% confidence interval, 78% to 81%) at ten years (141 knees). Multivariate regression analysis showed the most significant predictors of prosthetic survival to be the age of the patient and the life in service of the primary total knee replacement (that is, the time between the primary total knee replacement and the revision). Survivorship was also significantly predicted by the year of the first revision total knee arthroplasty and the reason for the revision. CONCLUSIONS: An age greater than seventy years, revision five years or more after the primary arthroplasty, and absence of patellar subluxation are positive indicators of survival of a revision total knee replacement. We believe that normal aging as well as the deconditioning effect of disease (osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis) and its treatment (primary total knee replacement) may lead to a reduced activity level, which, together with a presumed reluctance to operate on elderly patients, protects against repeat revisions. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II. See Instructions to Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee, Female, Finland, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prosthesis Design, Prosthesis Failure, Registries, Reoperation, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16818966


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.