Medical Journals

Glycemic Control and Macrovascular Disease in Types 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:
  • Stettler Christoph
  • Allemann Sabin
  • Jüni Peter
  • Cull Carole A
  • Holman Rury R
  • Egger Matthias
  • Krähenbühl Stephan
  • Diem Peter

From: Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Switzerland.

American heart journal

  • Publish Date: Jul 2006
  • ISSN: 1097-6744
  • Volume: 152
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 27-38
  • Medium: Internet
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Stettler Christoph, Allemann Sabin, Jüni Peter, et al. Glycemic Control and Macrovascular Disease in Types 1 and 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Meta-analysis of Randomized Trials.. Am. Heart J. Jul 2006;152:27-38

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty persists concerning the effect of improved long-term glycemic control on macrovascular disease in diabetes mellitus (DM). METHODS: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing interventions to improve glycemic control with conventional treatment in type 1 and type 2 diabetes. Outcomes included the incidence rate ratios for any macrovascular event, cardiac events, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease, and the number needed to treat intensively during 10 years to prevent one macrovascular event. RESULTS: The analysis was based on 8 randomized comparisons including 1800 patients with type 1 DM (134 macrovascular events, 40 cardiac events, 88 peripheral vascular events, 6 cerebrovascular events, 11293 person-years of follow-up) and 6 comparisons including 4472 patients with type 2 DM (1587 macrovascular events, 1197 cardiac events, 87 peripheral vascular events, 303 cerebrovascular events, 43607 person-years). Combined incidence rate ratios for any macrovascular event were 0.38 (95% CI 0.26-0.56) in type 1 and 0.81 (0.73-0.91) in type 2 DM. In type 1 DM, effect was mainly based on reduction of cardiac and peripheral vascular events and, in type 2 DM, due to reductions in stroke and peripheral vascular events. Effects appear to be particularly important in younger patients with shorter duration of diabetes. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that attempts to improve glycemic control reduce the incidence of macrovascular events both in type 1 and type 2 DM. In absolute terms, benefits are comparable, although effects on specific manifestations of macrovascular disease differ.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adult, Blood Glucose, Comorbidity, Coronary Disease, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Angiopathies, Female, Hemoglobin A, Glycosylated, Humans, Incidence, Male, Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Postprandial Period, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Risk Factors, Stroke, Treatment Outcome


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16824829


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.