Trace Conditioning and the Hippocampus: the Importance of Contiguity.
From: Department of Psychology and Center for Collaborative Neuroscience, Rutgers University, Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, USA.
The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience
- Publish Date: Aug 2006
- ISSN: 1529-2401
- Volume: 26
- Issue: 34
- Pages: 8702-6
- Medium: Internet
- Language: English
- Citation (JAMA): Bangasser Debra A, Waxler David E, Santollo Jessica, et al. Trace Conditioning and the Hippocampus: the Importance of Contiguity.. J. Neurosci. Aug 2006;26:8702-6
Abstract
Trace conditioning, a form of classical conditioning in which the presentation of the conditioned stimulus (CS) and the unconditioned stimulus (US) is separated in time by an interstimulus interval, requires an intact hippocampus. In contrast, classical conditioning procedures in which the CS and US are not separated by an interstimulus interval (i.e., delay conditioning procedures) typically do not (Solomon et al., 1986). However, why trace conditioning is dependent on the hippocampus is unknown. Several theories suggest that it is specifically the discontiguity between the CS and US in trace conditioning that critically engages the hippocampus. However, there are other explanations that do not depend on discontiguity. To determine whether the lack of contiguity renders trace conditioning hippocampal dependent, we designed a “contiguous trace conditioning” (CTC) paradigm in which CS-US contiguity is restored by re-presenting the CS simultaneously with the US. Although rats with excitotoxic lesions of the hippocampus could not learn a standard trace fear-conditioning paradigm, lesioned rats trained on CTC showed significant conditioning, at levels similar to those with sham surgeries. Importantly, lesioned rats trained solely with simultaneous CS-US presentations did not demonstrate conditioning. Together, these data suggest that rats with hippocampal lesions can form a memory of a trace CS-US association when contiguity is restored. Therefore, the dependence of traditional trace paradigms on the hippocampus can be attributed to the absence of temporal contiguity.
Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, Brain Diseases, Conditioning, Classical, Fear, Hippocampus, Male, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Time Factors
Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 16928858
This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.
Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.
The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.