Medical Journals

Cognate Ligand Domain Mapping for Enzymes.

Authors:
  • Bashton Matthew
  • Nobeli Irene
  • Thornton Janet M

From: EMBL-European Bioinformatics Institute, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK. bashton@ebi.ac.uk

Journal of molecular biology

  • Publish Date: Dec 2006
  • ISSN: 0022-2836
  • Volume: 364
  • Issue: 4
  • Pages: 836-52
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Bashton Matthew, Nobeli Irene, Thornton Janet M, et al. Cognate Ligand Domain Mapping for Enzymes.. J. Mol. Biol. Dec 2006;364:836-52

Abstract

Here, we present an automatic assignment of potential cognate ligands to domains of enzymes in the CATH and SCOP protein domain classifications on the basis of structural data available in the wwPDB. This procedure involves two steps; firstly, we assign the binding of particular ligands to particular domains; secondly, we compare the chemical similarity of the PDB ligands to ligands in KEGG in order to assign cognate ligands. We find that use of the Enzyme Commission (EC) numbers is necessary to enable efficient and accurate cognate ligand assignment. The PROCOGNATE database currently has cognate ligand mapping for 3277 (4118) protein structures and 351 (302) superfamilies, as described by the CATH and (SCOP) databases, respectively. We find that just under half of all ligands are only and always bound by a single domain, with 16% bound by more than one domain and the remainder of the ligands showing a variety of binding modes. This finding has implications for domain recombination and the evolution of new protein functions. Domain architecture or context is also found to affect substrate specificity of particular domains, and we discuss example cases. The most popular PDB ligands are all found to be generic components of crystallisation buffers, highlighting the non-cognate ligand problem inherent in the PDB. In contrast, the most popular cognate ligands are all found to be universal cellular currencies of reducing power and energy such as NADH, FADH2 and ATP, respectively, reflecting the fact that the vast majority of enzymatic reactions utilise one of these popular co-factors. These ligands all share a common adenine ribonucleotide moiety, suggesting that many different domain superfamilies have converged to bind this chemical framework.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adenine Nucleotides, Binding Sites, Databases, Protein, Enzymes, Ligands, Protein Binding, Protein Interaction Mapping, Substrate Specificity


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17034815


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.