Medical Journals

Prospective Multicentre Evaluation of Adverse Outcomes Following Treatment for Complicated Diverticular Disease.

Authors:
  • Constantinides V A
  • Tekkis P P
  • Senapati A

From: Imperial College London, Department of Surgical Oncology and Technology, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK.

The British journal of surgery

  • Publish Date: Dec 2006
  • ISSN: 0007-1323
  • Volume: 93
  • Issue: 12
  • Pages: 1503-13
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Constantinides V A, Tekkis P P, Senapati A, et al. Prospective Multicentre Evaluation of Adverse Outcomes Following Treatment for Complicated Diverticular Disease.. Dec 2006;93:1503-13

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The choice of operation for complicated diverticular disease is contentious. The aim of this study was to investigate adverse events following restorative (primary resection and anastomosis, PRA) and non-restorative (Hartmann’s procedure, HP) surgery for complicated diverticular disease. METHODS: Five hundred and thirty-nine patients who presented with complicated diverticular disease in 42 centres over a 12-month period from January 2003 were considered for the study. Data were collected prospectively from 248 patients (46.0 per cent) who underwent PRA and 167 (31.0 per cent) who had HP. A propensity score was developed for case-mix adjustment. Multifactorial logistic regression was used to evaluate differences in operative outcomes. RESULTS: Mortality, surgical and medical complication rates were 4.0, 31.0 and 13.7 per cent respectively after PRA, and 23.4, 53.3 and 40.7 per cent for HP (all P < 0.001). After adjusting for the propensity score, the HP group had a 2.1- and 1.9-fold increase in medical and surgical complications respectively compared with those who had PRA, whereas the operative mortality rate was not significantly different. Non-colorectal surgeons performed a significantly higher proportion of HPs in the non-elective setting than colorectal surgeons (80.6 versus 60.4 per cent; chi(2) = 8.31, 1 d.f., P = 0.004). CONCLUSION: PRA with or without a proximal diversion is more often performed non-electively by specialist colorectal surgeons. It may be a safe procedure for complicated diverticular disease in selected patients as it may be associated with fewer postoperative adverse events.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anastomosis, Surgical, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Diverticulum, Colon, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multivariate Analysis, Postoperative Complications, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Treatment Outcome


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17048279


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.