Medical Journals

Kinematic Analysis of Upper Limbs and Trunk Movement During Bilateral Movement After Stroke.

Authors:
  • Messier Sylvie
  • Bourbonnais Daniel
  • Desrosiers Johanne
  • Roy Yves

From: School of Rehabilitation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada. sylviemessier@yahoo.com

Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation

  • Publish Date: Nov 2006
  • ISSN: 0003-9993
  • Volume: 87
  • Issue: 11
  • Pages: 1463-70
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Messier Sylvie, Bourbonnais Daniel, Desrosiers Johanne, et al. Kinematic Analysis of Upper Limbs and Trunk Movement During Bilateral Movement After Stroke.. Nov 2006;87:1463-70

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the kinematics of the upper limbs and trunk during unilateral and parallel bilateral tasks in subjects with hemiparesis and control subjects. DESIGN: Comparative study. SETTING: Geriatric center offering rehabilitation services. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 15 persons (age, 69.4 +/- 12.0 y; > or = 3 mo poststroke) recruited in a geriatric center with rehabilitation services, and 13 control persons (67.8 +/- 7.5 y) participated in the study. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Unilateral and bilateral movements toward 1 or 2 targets located beyond arm’s length and positioned in 3 directions. Angular changes of both upper limbs and trunk were characterized in the sagittal, frontal, and horizontal planes. RESULTS: During the bilateral task, the deficits of the kinematic joints of the paretic upper limb persisted in subjects with hemiparesis as compared with the corresponding upper limb in the control subjects (abduction shoulder: subjects with hemiparesis, 5.7 degrees +/- 5.3 degrees; control subjects, 0.7 degrees +/- 4.8 degrees; extension elbow: subjects with hemiparesis, 38.2 degrees +/- 14.2 degrees; control subjects, 52.8 degrees +/- 12.5 degrees) with a marked flexion of the trunk (subjects with hemiparesis, 33.7 degrees +/- 8.7 degrees; control subjects, 26.8 degrees +/- 5.8 degrees). The elbow extension of the nonparetic upper limb was reduced (subjects with hemiparesis, 41.0 degrees +/- 13.6 degrees; control subjects, 52.8 degrees +/- 12.5 degrees). CONCLUSIONS: The use of parallel bilateral reaching tasks and placing movements of the upper extremities in the subjects with hemiparesis contributed an increase in the trunk flexion rather than improve the motor performance of the paretic upper limb, especially with regard to increasing elbow extension.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Aged, Biomechanics, Case-Control Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Movement, Paresis, Range of Motion, Articular, Stroke, Thorax, Upper Extremity


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17084121


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.