Medical Journals

Quantification of Perfusion Modes in Terms of Surplus Hemodynamic Energy Levels in a Simulated Pediatric Cpb Model.

Authors:
  • Undar Akif
  • Ji Bingyang
  • Lukic Branka
  • Zapanta Conrad M
  • Kunselman Allen R
  • Reibson John D
  • Weiss William J
  • Rosenberg Gerson
  • Myers John L

From: Department of Pediatrics, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Penn State College of Medicine, Penn State Children’s Hospital, Hershey, Pennsylvania 17033-0850, USA.

ASAIO journal (American Society for Artificial Internal Organs : 1992)

  • Publish Date:
  • ISSN: 1538-943X
  • Volume: 52
  • Issue: 6
  • Pages: 712-7
  • Medium: Internet
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Undar Akif, Ji Bingyang, Lukic Branka, et al. Quantification of Perfusion Modes in Terms of Surplus Hemodynamic Energy Levels in a Simulated Pediatric Cpb Model.. ASAIO J. ;52:712-7

Abstract

The objective of this investigation was to compare pulsatile versus nonpulsatile perfusion modes in terms of surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) levels during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a simulated neonatal model.The extracorporeal circuit consisted of a Jostra HL-20 heart-lung machine (for both pulsatile and nonpulsatile modes of perfusion), a Capiox Baby RX hollow-fiber membrane oxygenator, a Capiox pediatric arterial filter, 5 feet of arterial tubing and 6 feet of venous tubing with a quarter-inch diameter. The circuit was primed with a lactated Ringers solution. The systemic resistance of a pseudo-patient (mean weight, 3 kg) was simulated by placing a clamp at the end of the arterial line. The pseudo-patient was subjected to five pump flow rates in the 400 to 800 ml/min range. During pulsatile perfusion, the pump rate was kept constant at 120 bpm. Pressure waveforms were recorded at the preoxygenator, postoxygenator, and preaortic cannula sites. SHE was calculated by use of the following formula {SHE (ergs/cm) = 1,332 [((integral fpdt) / (integral fdt)) - Mean Arterial Pressure]} (f = pump flow and p = pressure). A total of 60 experiments were performed (n = 6 for nonpulsatile and n = 6 for pulsatile) at each of the five flow rates. A linear mixed-effects model, which accounts for the correlation among repeated measurements, was fit to the data to assess differences in SHE between flows, pumps, and sites. The Tukey multiple comparison procedure was used to adjust p values for post hoc pairwise comparisons.With a pump flow rate of 400 ml/min, pulsatile flow generated significantly higher surplus hemodynamic energy levels at the preoxygenator site (23,421 +/- 2,068 ergs/cm vs. 4,154 +/- 331 ergs/cm, p < 0.0001), the postoxygenator site (18,784 +/- 1,557 ergs/cm vs. 3,383 +/- 317 ergs/cm, p < 0.0001), and the precannula site (6,324 +/- 772 ergs/cm vs. 1,320 +/- 91 ergs/cm, p < 0.0001), compared with the nonpulsatile group. Pulsatile flow produced higher SHE levels at all other pump flow rates.The Jostra HL-20 roller pump generated significantly higher SHE levels in the pulsatile mode when compared with the nonpulsatile mode at all five pump flow rates.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Pressure, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Energy Metabolism, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Models, Cardiovascular, Pulsatile Flow


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17117064


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.