Medical Journals

Recovery of Electromyographic Activity After Transection and Surgical Repair of the Rat Sciatic Nerve.

Authors:
  • English Arthur W
  • Chen Yi
  • Carp Jonathan S
  • Wolpaw Jonathan R
  • Chen Xiang Yang

From: Department of Cell Biology, Emory University School of Medicine, 615 Michael Street, Room 405P, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA. art@cellbio.emory.edu

Journal of neurophysiology

  • Publish Date: Feb 2007
  • ISSN: 0022-3077
  • Volume: 97
  • Issue: 2
  • Pages: 1127-34
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): English Arthur W, Chen Yi, Carp Jonathan S, et al. Recovery of Electromyographic Activity After Transection and Surgical Repair of the Rat Sciatic Nerve.. J. Neurophysiol. Feb 2007;97:1127-34

Abstract

The recovery of soleus (SOL), gastrocnemius (GAS), and tibialis anterior (TA) electromyographic activity (EMG) after transection and surgical repair of the sciatic nerve was studied in Sprague-Dawley rats using chronically implanted stimulation and recording electrodes. Spontaneous EMG activity in SOL and GAS and direct muscle (M) responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation persisted for < or =2 days after sciatic nerve transection, but SOL and GAS H-reflexes disappeared immediately. Spontaneous EMG activity began to return 2-3 wk after transection, rose nearly to pretransection levels by 60 days, and persisted for the duration of the study period (120 days). Recovery of stimulus-evoked EMG responses began about 30 days after sciatic nerve transection as multiple small responses with a wide range of latencies. Over time, the latencies of these fractionated responses shortened, their amplitudes increased, and they merged into a distinct short-latency component (the putative M response) and a distinct long-latency component (the putative H-reflex). The extent of recovery of stimulation-evoked EMG was modest: even 100 days after sciatic nerve transection, the responses were still much smaller than those before transection. Similar gradual development of responses to posterior tibial nerve stimulation was also seen in TA, suggesting that some regenerating fibers sent branches into both tibial and common peroneal nerves.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, Body Weight, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Electric Stimulation, Electrodes, Implanted, Electromyography, Evoked Potentials, H-Reflex, Male, Muscle, Skeletal, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Sciatic Nerve, Tibial Nerve


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17122310


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.