Medical Journals

Biomechanical Analysis of Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Fixed-angle Screw-plate Construct Versus Condylar Blade Plate.

Authors:
  • Higgins Thomas F
  • Pittman Gavin
  • Hines Jerod
  • Bachus Kent N

From: University of Utah Department of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, UT 84106, USA. Thomas.higgins@hsc.utah.edu

Journal of orthopaedic trauma

  • Publish Date: Jan 2007
  • ISSN: 0890-5339
  • Volume: 21
  • Issue: 1
  • Pages: 43-6
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Higgins Thomas F, Pittman Gavin, Hines Jerod, et al. Biomechanical Analysis of Distal Femur Fracture Fixation: Fixed-angle Screw-plate Construct Versus Condylar Blade Plate.. Jan 2007;21:43-6

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to establish the relative strength of fixation of a locking distal femoral plate compared with the condylar blade plate. METHODS: Eight matched pairs of fresh-frozen cadaveric femurs were selected and evaluated for bone density. A gap osteotomy model was used to simulate an OTA/AO A3 comminuted distal femur fracture. One femur of each pair was fixed with the blade plate; the other, with a locking plate. After 100 N preload and 10,000 cycles between 100 N and 1000 N, total displacement of each specimen was assessed. After completion of cyclic loading, maximum load to failure was tested. RESULTS: Significantly greater subsidence (total axial displacement) occurred with the blade plate (1.70 +/- 0.45 mm; range, 1.21-2.48 mm) than with the locking plate fixation (1.04 +/- 0.33 mm; range, 0.67-1.60 mm) after cyclic loading (P = 0.03). In load-to-failure testing, force absorbed by the locking plate before failure (9085 +/- 1585 N; range, 7269-11,850 N) was significantly greater than the load tolerated by the blade plate construct (5591 +/- 945 N; range, 3546-6684 N; P = 0.001). Variability in bone mineral density did not affect the findings (fixed angle distal femoral plate r = 0.1563; condylar blade plate r = 0.0796). CONCLUSIONS: The locking screw-plate construct proved stronger than the blade plate in both cyclic loading and ultimate strength in biomechanical testing of a simulated A3 distal femur fracture. Although differences were small, the biomechanical performance of the locking plate construct over the blade plate may lend credence to use of the locking plate versus the blade plate in the fixation of comminuted distal femur fractures.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Biomechanics, Bone Plates, Bone Screws, Cadaver, Equipment Design, Equipment Failure Analysis, Femoral Fractures, Fracture Fixation, Internal, Humans, Stress, Mechanical, Tensile Strength, Treatment Outcome


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17211268


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.