Medical Journals

Functional Circuitry for Peripheral Suppression in Mammalian Y-type Retinal Ganglion Cells.

Authors:
  • Zaghloul Kareem A
  • Manookin Michael B
  • Borghuis Bart G
  • Boahen Kwabena
  • Demb Jonathan B

From: Department of Neuroscience, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Journal of neurophysiology

  • Publish Date: Jun 2007
  • ISSN: 0022-3077
  • Volume: 97
  • Issue: 6
  • Pages: 4327-40
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Zaghloul Kareem A, Manookin Michael B, Borghuis Bart G, et al. Functional Circuitry for Peripheral Suppression in Mammalian Y-type Retinal Ganglion Cells.. J. Neurophysiol. Jun 2007;97:4327-40

Abstract

A retinal ganglion cell receptive field is made up of an excitatory center and an inhibitory surround. The surround has two components: one driven by horizontal cells at the first synaptic layer and one driven by amacrine cells at the second synaptic layer. Here we characterized how amacrine cells inhibit the center response of on- and off-center Y-type ganglion cells in the in vitro guinea pig retina. A high spatial frequency grating (4-5 cyc/mm), beyond the spatial resolution of horizontal cells, drifted in the ganglion cell receptive field periphery to stimulate amacrine cells. The peripheral grating suppressed the ganglion cell spiking response to a central spot. Suppression of spiking was strongest and observed most consistently in off cells. In intracellular recordings, the grating suppressed the subthreshold membrane potential in two ways: a reduced slope (gain) of the stimulus-response curve by approximately 20-30% and, in off cells, a tonic approximately 1-mV hyperpolarization. In voltage clamp, the grating increased an inhibitory conductance in all cells and simultaneously decreased an excitatory conductance in off cells. To determine whether center response inhibition was presynaptic or postsynaptic (shunting), we measured center response gain under voltage-clamp and current-clamp conditions. Under both conditions, the peripheral grating reduced center response gain similarly. This result suggests that reduced gain in the ganglion cell subthreshold center response reflects inhibition of presynaptic bipolar terminals. Thus amacrine cells suppressed ganglion cell center response gain primarily by inhibiting bipolar cell glutamate release.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, Guinea Pigs, Membrane Potentials, Models, Neurological, Neural Inhibition, Neural Networks (Computer), Patch-Clamp Techniques, Photic Stimulation, Reaction Time, Retina, Retinal Ganglion Cells, Sensory Thresholds, Visual Fields, Visual Perception


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17460102


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.