Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with an Abdominoperineal Resection in the Total Mesorectal Excision Trial.
From: Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Annals of surgery
- Publish Date: Jul 2007
- ISSN: 0003-4932
- Volume: 246
- Issue: 1
- Pages: 83-90
- Medium: Print
- Language: English
- Citation (JAMA): den Dulk Marcel, Marijnen Corrie A M, Putter Hein, et al. Risk Factors for Adverse Outcome in Patients with Rectal Cancer Treated with an Abdominoperineal Resection in the Total Mesorectal Excision Trial.. Ann. Surg. Jul 2007;246:83-90
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to identify tumor- and patient-related risk factors for distal rectal cancer in patients treated with an abdominoperineal resection (APR) associated with positive circumferential resection margin (CRM), local recurrence (LR), and overall survival (OS). BACKGROUND: The introduction of total mesorectal excision (TME) has improved the outcome of patients with rectal cancer. However, survival of patients treated with an APR improved less than of those treated with low anterior resections (LAR). Besides, an APR is associated with a higher LR rate. METHODS: Patients were selected from the TME trial, which is a randomized, multicenter trial, studying the effects of preoperative radiotherapy (RT) in 1861 patients. Of the Dutch patients, 455 underwent an APR. Location of the bulk of the tumor was scored with surgery, pathology, or other reports. CRM was available from pathology reports. RESULT: A positive CRM was found in 29.6% of all patients, 44% for anterior, 21% for lateral, 23% for posterior, and 17% for (semi)circular tumor location (P < 0.0001). In a multivariate analysis, T-stage, N-stage, and tumor location were independent risk factors for CRM. If a (partial) resection of the vaginal wall was performed in women, 47.8% of patients still had a positive CRM. T-stage, N-stage, and CRM were risk factors for LR and age, T-stage, N-stage, CRM, and distance of the inferior tumor margin to the anal verge for OS. CONCLUSION: Age, T-stage, N-stage, CRM, distance of the tumor to the anal verge, and tumor location were independent risk factors for adverse outcome in patients treated with an APR for low rectal cancer. Anterior location, specifically in women, more often requires downstaging and/or more extended resection to obtain free margins.
Mesh Headings (Keywords): Abdomen, Adenocarcinoma, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Perineum, Postoperative Complications, Preoperative Care, Rectal Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome
Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17592295
This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.
Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.
The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.