Medical Journals

Mechanistic Bases for Differences in Passive Absorption.

Authors:
  • Lavin Shana R
  • McWhorter Todd J
  • Karasov William H

From: Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA.

The Journal of experimental biology

  • Publish Date: Aug 2007
  • ISSN: 0022-0949
  • Volume: 210
  • Issue: Pt 15
  • Pages: 2754-64
  • Medium: Print
  • Language: English
  • Citation (JAMA): Lavin Shana R, McWhorter Todd J, Karasov William H, et al. Mechanistic Bases for Differences in Passive Absorption.. J. Exp. Biol. Aug 2007;210:2754-64

Abstract

Increasing evidence indicates that small birds have more extensive non-mediated, paracellular intestinal absorption of hydrosoluble compounds than do mammals, although studies have not employed uniform methodologies or demonstrated differences at the tissue level. The mechanistic bases behind apparent species differences are poorly understood. We show using uniform methodology at the whole-animal level that intact, unanesthetized pigeons had significantly higher absorption of l-arabinose and l-rhamnose, two water-soluble compounds used to measure paracellular absorption, than similarly sized laboratory rats. The species differences were also evident using perfused isolated loops of duodenum, showing that the difference in paracellular absorption occurred at the tissue level, even when d-glucose absorption rates (transcellular+paracellular) were similar between the two species. The greater absorption of these probes in pigeons could not be explained by mediated uptake of the putative paracellular probes, or by increased nominal surface area, increased villus area or increased number of tight junctions. Rats and pigeons had comparable absorption of larger probes, which is consistent with similar effective pore size of the tight junction between enterocytes. The elimination of these mechanistic explanations might suggest that pigeon intestine has relatively higher paracellular solvent drag, but pigeon duodenal segments did not have higher net water absorption than rat duodenal segments. Whatever the exact mechanism(s), the paracellular pathway of both species limits substantial (>5%) fractional absorption to molecules smaller than about 4.8 A (M(r) ca. 350), and permeability to smaller molecules at the tissue level is higher in pigeons than in rats.

Mesh Headings (Keywords): Animals, Arabinose, Columbidae, Intestinal Absorption, Intestine, Small, Male, Rats, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Rhamnose


Check for Full Text / PubMed Unique Identifier (PMID): 17644690


This abstract is part of PubMed, a service of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. PubMed includes more than 17 million citations from MEDLINE and other life science journals for biomedical articles. See Copyright and Disclaimers.

Linked medical terms appearing on this page are added by Healia to help readers find more information and are not part of the original PubMed document.

The data herein was last updated on July 8th, 2008 and may not reflect the most current and accurate data available from NLM.


Advertisements

About | Privacy Policy | Business Solutions | Advertise | Contact | Add Healia to your site

©2012. Healia / Meredith Corporation  

Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. All content on this Web site, including medical opinion and any other health-related information, is for informational purposes only and should not be used for a specific diagnosis or individual treatment plan for any situation. Use of this site and the information contained herein does not create a doctor-patient relationship. Always seek the direct advice of your doctor in connection with any questions or issues you may have regarding your own health or the health of others.